Julie Pastikova vs Lea Belanska Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Julie Pastikova has a significant advantage in second serve performance, winning 41.54% of points in recent months, compared to Lea Belanska's 0%. How important is this stat? It's highly correlated with predicting match outcomes.
• What about return games? Julie Pastikova dominates here too, winning 47.58% of points on opponents' second serves, in contrast to Lea Belanska’s 0%. The same trend is seen with first serve returns.
• Under pressure, Julie Pastikova saves 38.71% of breakpoints, while Lea Belanska has not saved any; this indicates Julie's stronger mental toughness.
• In terms of overall match wins, Julie has secured 57.69% in the last year, whereas Lea has not won any matches, suggesting a distinct performance gap.
• On clay, Julie has a 50% win rate, marking her best surface; Lea's career performance on any surface remains undefined.
• Julie participates mainly in high-level Challenger/ITF tournaments, boasting a win rate of 54.55%. Lea has played zero matches, indicating less experience.
• Julie competes against players with an average rank of 233.04, whereas Lea's average opponent rank is 0, suggesting Julie faces tougher competition.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Julie likely prevails, winning 56% of such sets, compared to Lea's 0% success rate.

Editorial Prediction (September 29, 2025, UTC):

Julie Pastikova has demonstrated superior performance across multiple key areas, including second serve points and return game prowess. Her ability to save breakpoints when under pressure further enhances her prospects.

In contrast, Lea Belanska’s performance metrics are notably lacking, particularly evident in her failure to win any matches recently. The lack of experience and competition against lower-ranked opponents also contribute to her disadvantages.

Taking all factors into account, Julie Pastikova is strongly positioned and most likely to win the upcoming tennis match, given her consistent performance metrics and competitive experience.